This summer I’ve been fortunate enough to attend three different motorcycle demo events: Kawasaki, Harley-Davidson, and Triumph. While the basics were similar the details made these drastically different events.
General Operation
Overall, these events operated in a similar manner. The bikes were split into groups (2 each for Harley and Triumph, 3 for Kawasaki) and groups left in regular intervals. You signed up for a bike and were given a time to ride that bike. Triumph was the only one to put a limit on the number of rides, a paltry 2. Kawasaki and Harley were more giving; just wait in line and sign up.
Kawasaki provided a nice awning covered area with a very popular water cooler (the heat index was well over 100° that day). The crowd started to taper off due to the heat leaving open spots in some of the rides. The organizers would yell out the bikes that were still available in the group to keep the bikes out.
Blue Springs Harley-Davidson had some tents, a band, food and a Harley on rollers so you could “run it through the gears” in the parking lot. Harley did specifically have helmets to lend out. I assume they anticipate lots of novelty helmets and don’t want to risk the liability of sending someone out with a fake helmet.
Triumph had a tented area for the riders’ meeting and El Dorado Cycle provided coffee, donuts, water, and hot dogs.
Bikes
Each of the manufacturers had at least one of each model (except the Ninja 250, I can’t figure out why Kawasaki didn’t have one of those … oh and the ER-6n). The Harleys and Kawasakis were all stock while Triumph had quite a few modified bikes. Specifically, Triumph added aftermarket (Arrow) exhausts and windshields to a few bikes. Given the emotional nature of a motorcycle purchase, this is a great strategy. I attended a Ducati event in 2009 and every bike had carbon fiber Termignoni exhaust which made the demo much more visceral.
Not that I expected different, but Harley had the most limited range of bikes. Triumph and Kawasaki make a wide variety of styles of motorcycle while Harley makes only large cruisers with one exception, the XR1200 which is a standard motorcycle.
Route
A good route is the foundation of a fun (or exciting) motorcycle ride. For a test ride, you really want to see a mix of riding: a little slow around town, a little high speed highway, and some turns.
Distance and time are from tracing the route in Google Maps.
Kawasaki – 13.7 miles, 33 minutes
The route chosen by the Kawasaki team (Google Maps link) included a lot of the better roads in the area. My short pleasure rides will frequently include some of these roads. The speed limits are low (45 MPH tops) but the escort riders paid little attention to the speed limits anyway.
Given the area and the time allotted, Kawasaki did an excellent job of picking interesting roads.
Harley-Davidson – 8.7 miles, 19 minutes
Harley-Davidson’s route (Google Maps link) is fairly tame. A few sweeping curves but mostly straight road with low speed limits (again, 45 MPH). Unfortunately the escorts kept to the posted speed limits.
Triumph – 24.9 miles, 38 minutes
The Triumph event was on completely unfamiliar roads so I can’t comment as to whether there are better roads in the area. I can say that I would love to have DD around here. It has lots of nice high speed turns that flowed really well. It never took 38 minutes.
Pace
Admittedly, pace is completely subjective. Some riders are completely content cruising around, while others are full on all the time. I think I fall in the middle. I like to keep a swift speed, get some good lean in the corners, feel some serious acceleration … but avoid tickets. In this respect Kawasaki and Triumph got it perfect while Harley failed miserably.
In Harley’s defense, Kawasaki had their cruisers in a separate group from the sport bikes and standards. I wash only in the sport and standard groups. They may have kept the pace slower for the cruiser group. That said, Kawasaki was pretty fast easily 5 – 15 MPH over the speed limit at all times. They also seemed to expect pretty adept riders as evidenced by one of the ride leaders doing a U-turn after missing a turn. Honestly, if I were leading a group of people on unfamiliar bikes, I would not have them U-turn. Fortunately, no one dropped any bikes and we made it back in one piece.
Harley was dreadfully slow. The acceleration was slow. The cruising speed was slow. The few gentle curves were slow. Easily the most boring motorcycle ride I’ve been on. I would have expected an occasional moment of hard acceleration … but no. Nothing but tameness. Despite the pace I was able to scrape the floorboards on the Softail 3 times. I assume they chose to keep speeds down to prevent accidents.
Triumph’s escort riders went out of their way to make sure the ride was fun. There were quite a few “wink and a nod” moments in the riders’ meeting, specifically: “ride your own ride” and “if you get pulled over, it’s our bike but your ticket.” It was as if the escort riders had read my mind. We were moving swiftly, keeping speed in the turns and there were clear moments of “accelerate hard now.” The halfway point was marked by a stop sign where we were instructed to “open it up” and “really wring it out here”.
Of note is how well Triumph’s cruisers appeared to handle. On my second ride I was behind a guy on a Speedmaster which is a low, feet forward styled cruiser. I expected to be limited by either the rider or the bike, but was pleasantly surprised to see that both were up to the task. The Speedmaster had plenty of ground clearance and kept pace with the lead rider with no problems. After the ride I spoke the the rider of the Speedmaster and he said that the pace was good but that he would not have been comfortable were it any more aggressive.
Rider Quality
Riding in a group of motorcycles is not something to be taken lightly as there is real potential for one rider to cause another one harm. A good rider can get in a group and figure out the dynamics in a few moments. A poor rider may not have enough control to keep up with themselves. In this setting, riders on unfamiliar bikes, the rider’s ability is plainly on display.
The quality of rider at the Harley demo was very poor. My friend and frequent riding companion was so upset by the poor control of the other riders that he stopped riding the bikes at the demo. It really was that bad. Every turn and corner was a mess of bobbing motorcycles bumbling back and forth in their lane. Given the slow speeds, we never needed to break the staggered formation to make the curves but I saw frequent crossings of the yellow lines.
The scary part, all of these terrible riders have their motorcycle license. This shows that there is a serious shortcoming in our rider training and licensing. There’s no logical reason that these guys should be allowed on the open road on a 700+ lbs motorcycle.
For Kawasaki, I can only speak to the sporting and standard groups as I was never out with the cruiser group. I would put the Kawasaki riders as competent. Quite a few of the riders would slow too much for the turns only to then pin the throttle once pointed in a straight line and oriented straight up. I never felt as though any of the riders were dangerous, just ineffective.
The riders at the Triumph event completely shocked me. The riders I saw were great at holding a steady line and accelerated and braked smoothly. On my first ride I was the “the slow guy” through the first two turns as I adapted to the feel of the blocky tires on the Scrambler.
Conclusions
I’m going to fuel some motorcycle stereotypes with this section. The Harley experience is exactly what I expected: slow, older riders, and poor ability. The design of their bikes plays to these characteristics. The low seat height of all of the H-D bikes (excepting the XR1200) give riders a false sense of security and stability as they straddle them on the showroom floor. Once moving, it takes actual skill to keep these behemoths in actual control. Sadly, I think a majority of Harley riders are not in control.
Kawasaki was perfunctory. The bikes are all fine machines, but none really grabbed me. They riders they attracted seemed to be more focused on motorcycling and had a higher skill level.
I’ll probably look like the ultimate fanboy here, but Triumph had the best demo event. They would have been perfect were it not for the 2 bike limit. I really could have ridden every bike there. The riders at the event seemed to be serious about riding and were able to competently handle their motorcycles. The bikes were presented in a way that made them very appealing with the aftermarket exhausts and accessories. The route and pace were impeccable. They also made it clear that they wanted you to go out and have fun.





































