2004-09-23

 

House Blocks Court on Pledge Case Rulings

So the House Blocks Court on Pledge Case Rulings. Yeah... what happened to checks an balances? In case anyone needs a refresher here it is:

Pretty simple and direct. No one part is too powerful. Well... this bill is totally stepping all over that. The talk about "activist judges" is a nice little marketing spin thought isn't it?

They also seem to totally neglect the fact the "Under God" wasn't even in the original pledge! Add to that that a large part of the founding fathers were deists and the references to God in the Constitution take on a completely different meaning. Oh there's that whole freedom of religion thing as well. I'll also repeat that here just in case:

Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
To break it down:

I don't see any "banning" going on. The 10 commandments aren't goign to be banned, "Under God" isn't going to be banned. They just cannot be sactioned by the government. I can only imagine the stink if statues of Buddha were placed in court houses. The same senators passing this bill would be strict constitutionalists on that day!


Comments: Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]